Will Yesterday’s Benching Help To Ignite Hanley Ramirez? It Certainly Can’t Hurt!

The situation with Hanley Ramirez is quickly coming to a head.  Missing time due to injuries is one thing, but what about his struggles at the plate?  If that wasn’t enough, the return of Jack McKeon as the Marlins manager has quickly resulted in some significant changes for the franchise, and seemingly in just one day.

According to the South Florida Sun-Sentinel (click here for the article):

“Marlins beat writer Juan C. Rodriguez on Twitter said: McKeon says he didn’t start Hanley because he didn’t like the way he was running Sunday.

Columnist Mike Berardino: Hanley on if he knows why he’s not in the lineup: ‘No. But I know I gotta stretch right now, that’s what I know’”.

Former manager Edwin Rodriguez had been sitting Ramirez in day games following night games, but that clearly isn’t the case here (considering the game was set to start at 7 PM).  Is it that McKeon doesn’t think Ramirez is healthy?  Or is it that he feels like Ramirez simply lacked hustle on Sunday?  That remains to be seen (though Ramirez did appear as a pinch hitter yesterday).

As if that wasn’t bad enough, Tom D’Angelo of The Palm Beach Post (click here for the post) reported that:

“Ramirez, the three-time All-Star arrived late to the clubhouse Monday, showing up after McKeon called the team together for a 3:30 p.m. meeting, according to people in the organization.”

That easily could’ve played a role into the decision as well.  However, whether it is due to hustle or not, the fact of the matter is that Ramirez has been a bitter disappointment.  Just look at the numbers through Sunday:

199 At Bats
.201 Batting Average (40 Hits)
4 Home Runs
17 RBI
32 Runs
12 Stolen Bases
.300 On Base Percentage
.296 Slugging Percentage
.231 Batting Average on Balls in Play

Maybe the simple fact is that McKeon wanted to get Ramirez’ attention, because what Rodriguez was doing clearly wasn’t working.  At this point simply moving him around the lineup, from third to leadoff to sixth just isn’t enough.  Something needed to be done and perhaps a simple benching will do the trick.

Obviously, bad luck is one of the issues plaguing Ramirez, but it isn’t the only one.  He has just 11 extra base hits (7 doubles, 4 home runs).  Through June 20, 2010 he had amassed 15 doubles, 2 triples and 11 home runs, a total of 28 extra base hits.

The problem is, some of the issues actually appear to date back to 2010, despite last season’s success.  Just look at the groundball rate over the past two seasons:

  • 2010 – 51.0%
  • 2011 – 54.1%

Those types of numbers certainly don’t lend themselves too much power.  It actually places him 11th among players who have qualified for the batting title, with the likes of Elvis Andrus, Alcides Escobar, Kosuke Fukudome and Miguel Tejada.  When you are talking about power, that is far from the group of players you want to be associated with.

Obviously, he hit 21 HR last season (courtesy of a 32.7% fly ball rate and a 14.2% HR/FB), so he can certainly generate enough power to grab our attention.  However, it’s not quite the 33 HR he put up a few years back, and you have to start to wonder if he will get back to that level.

His line drive rate has actually been trending down for the past three seasons from 19.8% in ’09 to 16.3% last season to 14.5% to date.  Another good reason as to why his power and overall production is down.

The question is, who is the really Hanley Ramirez?  Obviously he isn’t a .200 hitter, but looking for him to be a 30/30 player year in and year out simply may not be the case either.

Should you give up hope on him?  Nope.  Should you even consider trading him?  Probably not, because you aren’t going to get nearly market value.  Sooner or later he is going to start hitting to better luck, meaning the average is going to rise.  While he may not be a 30 HR hitter, 20-25 is certainly realistic.  Throw in some speed and you have a must owner player.

Maybe McKeon’s message will set in.  Maybe, just maybe, this is the start of what we have been waiting for.  It certainly couldn’t hurt.

What are your thoughts of Ramirez?  Will this benching be a wakeup call?  What type of production do you see from him for the rest of 2011?

Make sure to check out these other great articles from Rotoprofessor:

5 comments

  1. Alex says:

    The GB rate is ugly. He’s got more talent than he knows what to do with, but he’s lazy and has a bad attitude. Benching him was a step in the right direction, but I have a feeling one day off won’t be enough. He’ll turn it around eventually though.

  2. Giacomo says:

    Would you try to obtain him? I have Andrus, is it worth offering him to Hanley’s current owner straight up? Or should I stick with Andrus?

    • Def says:

      Of course you should offer Andrus straight up. And if the other owner accepts, your league mates should complain and whisper murmurs of a veto, only for you to tell them to quit being little he’s because they’re jealous of your great deal and have nothing come of the above mentioned rumors (other than the league agreeing that the former Hanley owner is a bozo).

      Good luck and you’re welcome.

    • Rotoprofessor says:

      I would do it without a second thought, though I can’t imagine the Hanley owner biting.

  3. ron says:

    Almost All-Star break and where is Hanley? If you fantasy expect miracles, go to the Hudson River. This guy is a loser and wants out of town big time. One way is to show your teammates it’s all about me and myself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>