2012 Projection: Salvador Perez: Does A Long-Term Contract = Fantasy Sleeper?

For those who have been reading Rotoprofessor since the end of the 2011 season, my feelings regarding Salvador Perez are not a secret.  The Royals clearly think highly of him as well, as Bob Dutton reported via Twitter that they signed their young catcher to a five-year, $7 million contract (which could max out at $26.75 million with incentives and three options). 

I recommended Perez to fantasy owners at the end of ‘11 and I would absolutely recommend him now.  Is he a lock to produce huge numbers?  Of course not, but he certainly gave a good first impression in 2011:

148 At Bats
.331 Batting Average (49 Hits)
3 Home Runs
21 RBI
20 Runs
0 Stolen Bases
.361 On Base Percentage
.473 Slugging Percentage
.362 Batting Average on Balls in Play

Is he going to be able to hit .331 once again?  It’s not likely, considering his significantly inflated BABIP.  Considering the wear and tear that catchers are forced to endure, to expect him to be able to replicate that type of number would be a major mistake.  However, he makes consistent contact (12.7% strikeout rate in the Majors) and was a .285 hitter in the minor leagues.  Assuming he can add a little bit more power (which we will talk about momentarily) there is the potential that he can be a consistent .300 hitter.

At the least, you would think that he should be able to hit .280, with the potential for more.  Last season there were 19 catchers with at least 400 plate appearances.  Only six hit at least .280 and three hit at least .290 (Mike Napoli, who hit .320, was the only one to hit above .305).  There is a chance that Perez can give you a significant advantage over the field.

As for the power, to this point in his career he hasn’t shown much (20 HR in 1,228 minor league AB).  However, at 6’3” and 230 lbs., would it really be a surprise to see him add power as he gains strength and experience (he won’t turn 22 until May)?  I’m not about to suggest that he is suddenly going to develop into a 25+ HR hitter, but 10-15 could be realistic as soon as this season. 

The truth is that it could get even better than that, though 2012 probably isn’t the year that he gets there.

The other advantage Perez should have is that he is likely going to play almost every day behind the plate.  The Royals have shown that they are committed to him and that is going to give him a chance to pad his counting stats.

Is he going to score a ton of runs?  No, because he’s as slow as molasses and will hit towards the bottom of the Royals lineup (seventh or eighth, most likely).  However, if he matched the pace he set in 2011 he would score 80 runs.  I wouldn’t anticipate that, but let’s just say in a full season he can reach at least 65.

There were only four catchers with at least 400 plate appearances that scored at least 70 runs in 2011.  In 2010 there was just one.  If he’s going to play regularly, it’s a huge advantage that he could provide for fantasy owners.

A baseline expectation for Perez would likely be .280 with 10 HR, 55 RBI and 55 R, and that could be low, as you can see from my 2012 projection:

.298 (146-490), 14 HR, 65 RBI, 60 R, 0 SB, .317 BABIP, .332 OBP, .439 SLG

The fact is that he is still learning and developing, but he showed in his cup of coffee that he can contribute to a fantasy roster.

Considering where you can get him (248.33 ADP according to Mock Draft Central) and the risk involved in selecting a catcher early, he is well worth targeting in all formats.   

***** Order the Rotoprofessor 2012 Fantasy Baseball Draft Guide, complete with updates from January through the start of the season, for just $6! As an added bonus, if you purchase by 3/15 you will be entered to win a Michael Pineda autographed baseball! To place your order click here. *****

Make sure to check out our 2012 projections:


  1. Bbboston says:

    With respect to his hr power, one thing that struck me strongly last year was that he hit a home run on the day his mother came to watch him play for the first time in the States.. This told me he’s focused on contact, BUT could selectively turn it on, even now. He just needs to learn the situations when to go for it.

  2. Nick Tenaglia says:

    Okay so I was originally going to say that Sal was not a safe bet for 2012 because of his lack of experience (he has less than 210 PAs above AA), but upon further research, it looks like he might be a good pick up. Allow me to geek out on some stats…

    So I compiled a data set of every Rookie Season from 2007 to 2010 that met the following criteria:
    1. The batter had between 100-200 PAs in the rookie season (Perez had 158 last year)
    2. The following season, the batter had more than 300 PAs (Perez should get at least 300 this season)

    This gave me a list of 39 players. From there, I then filtered out any player that was older than 24 in his Rookie Season. This left me with 29 players.

    Here is what I came up with….
    The average rookie season looked as follows:
    154 PA, .709 OPS, .313 BABIP, .261 Avg, .314 wOBA
    8% BB Rate, 19.7% K Rate, 18.7% LD Rate, .43 BB/K

    The Rookie+1 Seasons looked like this:
    437 PA, .701 OPS, .300 BABIP, .252 Avg, .311 wOBA
    8.4% BB Rate, 19.6% K Rate, 18.0 % LD Rate, .48 BB/K

    I was fully expecting the Rookie+1 Seasons to regress much more than they actually did. With this data set, you are looking at about a 2-4% Regression for most stats. BB Rate actually went up 5%. So using this model, let’s see what Sal Perez would have for stats this year:
    440 PA, .824 OPS, .347 BABIP, .320 Avg, .358 wOBA
    4.6% BB Rate, 12.6% K Rate, 28.1% LD Rate, .39 BB/K

    Clearly this is a very high projection, and that is most likely because Perez’s Rookie Stats are pretty impressive, but I must say that I am surprised that the expected regression is not greater

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>