Why The Risk Far Outweighs The Potential Reward For Ubaldo Jimenez

Just in case you needed reasons to cut bait and run away from ownership of Ubaldo Jimenez, let’s take a look and see what I recommend running away from him as quickly as possible:

7 Wins
88.1 Innings
4.69 ERA
1.54 WHIP
65 Strikeouts (6.62 K/9)
53 Walks (5.40 BB/9)
.271 BABIP
73.7% Strand Rate

There are numerous points that should tell you that Jimenez is a bad risk at this point in the season.  First of all the strikeout rate, which is down significantly from his 8.05 career mark.  Part of the problem is his decreased fastball velocity, which is down another tick from last season’s drop.  After averaging 96.1 mph in ’10 he dropped to 93.5 mph in ’11 and is down yet again to 92.4 mph this season.

Second issue is clearly his control.  From 2009-2011 he was able to post BB/9 between 3.50 and 3.75.  This season he is walking the ballpark and, while he has done better in June (3.06 BB/9) what exactly makes us think he could maintain it?  In his last two starts he has walked 8 batters in 12.2 IP, so the answer is nothing.  I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for Jimenez to continue avoiding the walks.

If those were the only two issues we’d have concerns, but it’s possible that we could overlook them.  However, the fact is that Jimenez is getting creamed to the tune of a 22.9% line drive rate.

As it is the BABIP is arguably on the lower side (though not unbelievable).  When you couple it with his inflated line drive rate, however, you realize that he could actually get worse as time progresses.

You can’t even argue that he’s getting marginally better as the season has gone on:

  • April – 22.1%
  • May – 24.8%
  • June – 21.2%

So, let’s recap.  We have a pitcher with a significantly decreased strikeout rate, significantly worse control and is getting hit hard (though he’s been lucky on the balls put in play).  Does this really sound like someone you want to invest in?

If you have him, I’d recommend trying to get rid of him.  If someone is trying to shop him to you, don’t bother.  While it’s not impossible that he gets things going there’s way too much risk to even consider taking.


Posted on by Rotoprofessor. This entry was posted in Player Analysis. Bookmark the permalink.




2 Responses to Why The Risk Far Outweighs The Potential Reward For Ubaldo Jimenez

  1. jon says:

    Hey Prof – I’m in need of a 3B and looking for some trade advice. I’m quite deep at SP (Verlander, Strasburg, Haren, Cliff Lee, Gallardo, Ian Kennedy, Kuroda, Bauer). And I’m currently starting Reynolds at 3B.

    Deal’s this: I give Gallardo, I get either Sandoval or Aramis.

    League is 10-team roto and counts OPS, QS and K/9 in addition. Gallardo’s been a QS machine, despite his WHIP issues. And I love Panda normally but his hamate and lack of XBH since returning worry me a bit. We hav a 200 GS limit so I definitely need to shed some pitching. Which if either would you recommend taking?

    • Rotoprofessor says:

      Gallardo wouldn’t be my top choice to part with, but trading a SP does make sense (if it’s not a keeper league I would definitely try cashing in on the Bauer hype).

      As for the 3B, I still like Sandoval better than Aramis. I know there are concerns, but he also has significantly more upside and I would be surprised if he didn’t move back up in the lineup before long.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>