AL-Only Addiction: Looking At The Best Way To Set-Up Your Format

by David Morris Jr.

You know who you are.  You’ve always wondered about it, but never took the plunge and changed everything you know about fantasy baseball to this point.  More than likely you started with 10 team mixers, been playing in 12-14 team leagues with “deep benches” for years, maybe you even manage a squad in a 16 team mixed league.  It’s time for a different challenge though, and it would be my pleasure to guide you along your new endeavor.  It’s time to talk AL Only leagues!

By cutting the player pool in half you will expose yourself to a much shallower player pool to draft from, testing your ability to evaluate playing time on par with overall talent.  Also, if your favorite baseball team happens to play in the American League, an AL Only league will give you the chance to roster players a typical mixed league format would not (I’m looking at you Eric Thames).  Fantasy baseball is supposed to be fun, why not have some of the players you root for nightly on your squad (without putting you at a huge disadvantage)? 

If in fact your favorite team does play in the American League, you are watching more games that involve other teams from the American League already, increasing your knowledge on this particular player pool.  Of course this type of format isn’t for everyone and if you’re new to fantasy baseball, I wouldn’t recommend this style of play until you have a couple of seasons under your belt in mixed leagues.  If you’re still interested in AL only leagues, let’s make like a “choose your own adventure book”, and move on to league setup.

There is no right or wrong way to play any style of fantasy baseball.  There is however the ideal way, and that’s what I will attempt to lay out for you below.  (Note:  Future AL Only articles written by me will always be based on what you’re about to read.)

First off, let’s tackle roster positions.  If you’re participating in an AL Only league, it also means it’s time to play with deeper rosters.  That means, two catchers (one works, but two is more fun) a 1st baseman, 2nd baseman, Short Stop, 3rd baseman, Corner Infielder, Middle Infielder, minimum four Outfielders (might as well make it five), a DH/Utility and nine pitching spots (OR C, C, 1B, 2B, SS, 3B, CI, MI, OF, OF, OF, OF, OF, DH, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P = 23 roster spots).  The number of bench spots is debatable, but ranges from zero in certain Keeper Leagues (a reserve/DL system is set up in these leagues) to 2-5.  Ideally, you want to keep the number of bench spots limited, as the waiver wire is not full of talent in this style of play.

It finally seems like the “bigger is better” attitude of the late 90’s/early 2000’s is fading away and for the most part people are realizing functionality mixed with performance wins out in the long run.  The same can be said when you approach an AL Only league for the first time.  It is my opinion this format is best played with 10 teams.  You can play with 12, but to try to push it beyond that is just silly.  Think about it.  There are 15 American League teams (Yes, the Astros count as a whole Major League team) and each team needs to roster five Outfielders.  15 (AL teams) x 3 (starting OF per team) = 45.  45 divided by 5 (OF needed) = 9, or one less team than your 10 team league.  Obviously 4th and even 5th outfielders become very valuable in this format, but the example above shows why 10 teams is a solid number for your AL Only league.  This example also shows why drafting at bats/playing time is more important than a team with multiple stars, however, we’ll dive into that subject later in the preseason, in our draft strategy post(s).

Another area that needs to be addressed is the acquisition of free agents/the waiver wire.  I believe whole heartedly that all leagues should use a FAAB system.  Furthermore, I believe the best set up is a weekly FAAB, but I also see the benefits for daily roster leagues to run FAAB 2 or 3 times a week.  The fact the free agent pool is so shallow in an AL Only league; not using a FAAB system puts league members at a complete disadvantage.  Also, anyone can be lucky and be online when news breaks Mike Trout* is being called up and nab him before other owners have a chance to pick him up.  It takes real strategy and skill to allocate “X” amount of FAAB towards a particular player, knowing everyone else in the league can also bid for that players services, and will need their remaining FAAB as the season continues on.  Allowing $0 bids is also recommended in this setup.   *Note: If you played in a league with bench spots and/or that allows you to roster players in the minors, Mike Trout would have been owned in all of these AL Only leagues.  That said many leagues require a player be on an active MLB roster before they can be placed on a team’s fantasy roster.  I highly recommend using this roster restriction.

I mentioned daily roster leagues above, and really either daily or weekly lineups are acceptable.  I prefer playing in leagues that FAAB once a week, with lineups being set the following day for that upcoming week.  It’s not a matter of taking the time to set daily lineups, it’s more the enjoyment in the challenge of predicting a weeks’ worth of games and seeing where everything falls from there.  Remember, everyone in the league is playing by the same rules.

The last set up item to address is the style of score keeping your AL Only league will use.  I only play in rotisserie (roto) leagues, and in my opinion, AL Only leagues should use this format as well.  This isn’t fantasy football we’re dealing with here.  This is 6 months of games, every day, with a more challenging setup.  You chose to participate in a league with half the player pool as compared to typical mixed leagues, don’t leave your title up to chance with Head-to-Head leagues, let the best team win.

From here there’s not much else to do, but grab a cup of coffee, turn on some background music and draft the team you’ll spend the next 6 months obsessing over.  My upcoming AL Only columns will primarily focus on auction drafts; however, snake drafts also work for AL Only leagues.  As with the other rules/league set up tips above, remember; fantasy is intended to be fun for all members involved and giving each member the right to place, what they feel is a fair bid to acquire a particular player, adds to the level of fun, as well as the strategy in constructing ones team.

In the coming weeks and months leading up to the 2013 season, I’ll preview individual American League players, dive into auction values by position for AL Only formats, take a look at mock draft results, and much more.  Stay tuned.

 

Posted on by Rotoprofessor. This entry was posted in Strategy. Bookmark the permalink.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

7 Responses to AL-Only Addiction: Looking At The Best Way To Set-Up Your Format

  1. Charlie says:

    Hi David: Nice article. I play in both an AL and NL only leagues. 12 teams, 5×5. The AL league uses DL – some owners want to go to Util like in the NL. One category in both leagues is BA – some owners want to go to OBP. What to you think about both issues?

  2. Dave says:

    Thanks Charlie, I appreciate the kind words. How deep are your rosters currently? MI, CI, 5 OF? Personally, I’ve always played AL only with a UTIL spot, even in 12 team leagues, but I’d say it all depends on your league members. Adding a UTIL spot will obviously remove 12 more players from the shallow pool of available “replacement level players”. With the Astros coming over, I don’t see this being as much of an issue for 12 teamers this year as compared to previous years.

    The BA/OBP issue is one I struggle with myself. I am a stickler for tradition and because of this I’ve never been able to completely stop playing in leagues that use BA, regardless of how “old school” some view the stat. I will say, my long time, 10 team/contract keeper league (keep up to 10) is switching over to OBP for this coming season and I am looking forward to the change. It was also agreed upon at the 2012 draft table as a change that would take place in 2013, giving owners enough time to get their rosters/keepers ready. If you’re in a redraft AL only the switch can be made this offseason. Ideally one of the NL/AL stays BA and one goes OBP. It’ll create a little more predraft work, but if you use a draft program or you can navigate excel with ease, sorting and ranking by OBP shouldn’t take much more time.

  3. Josh says:

    Excellent article Dave!

    • jmax says:

      Im guessing this is the same Dave who’s been posting very intuitive opinions the last few days. Rotoprofessor knows talent when he sees it. Roto, what’s Dave’s WAR in 2013??? Seriously though, from a readers standpoint you can never post enough articles for me and I’m sure many others. I look forward to his contributions

      • Rotoprofessor says:

        Thanks jmax, he is one and the same. Dave has agreed to come on to handle our AL Only coverage, though I’m sure he’ll be sharing his opinions on much more as well!

        I know I can say that I am happy to have him joining the team and am excited to see what he has in store for all of us!

        He may not be the only new face you see around here in the coming weeks/months, so don’t worry about the amount of content! You know from experience there’s going to be plenty of it!!

        • Dave says:

          That’s me! While I write AL Only here and over at my blog, I play in mixed leagues as well. If it’s fantasy baseball related, I’ll more than likely chime in with something! :) Look forward to talking fantasy with everyone in the future. Always available on twitter – @dmojr

  4. Bill says:

    Why $0 salaries?
    Are there going to be NL only too?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 












































Pages