Rankings Review: Why Eric Hosmer Is Not A Top 15 First Baseman Heading Into ’17

by Eric Stashin (aka The Rotoprofessor)

One of the players who fell short of our Top 15 First Baseman rankings earlier this week (click here to view) was the Royals’ Eric Hosmer.  Coming off a strong season it makes sense to expect him among the top tiers.  So why was he omitted?  Before we answer, first let’s look at the numbers from 2016:

605 At Bats
.266 Batting Average (161 Hits)
25 Home Runs
104 RBI
80 Runs
5 Stolen Bases
.328 On Base Percentage
.433 Slugging Percentage
.301 Batting Average on Balls in Play

The home run total was a career high (his previous best was 19 HR), and while the average was down it wasn’t a crippling mark.  The numbers justify potential Top 15 production, so why are we down on him?  It starts with the power…

Hosmer is now 27-years old, so there is reason to believe in a power surge.  However the underlying metrics are concerning.  Look at the fly ball rates over the past four seasons:

  • 2013 – 24.9%
  • 2014 – 31.9%
  • 2015 – 24.4%
  • 2016 – 24.7%

The owner of a career 13.4% HR/FB, he posted a 21.4% mark last season.  That alone would make us skeptical.

Last season there were 65 players who hit at least 25 HR, Hosmer was the only one to do so with a fly ball rate below 25%.  In fact there were only 3 other players who accomplished the feat with a fly ball rate below 30% (Corey Seager, Joey Votto and Ryan Braun were the others).  Considering that he has consistently posted this low of a fly ball rate, expecting him to replicate the power is difficult.

A drop in power will likely lead to a drop in his RBI production and he’s gone three straight seasons without reaching double-digit stolen bases.  That leads to his average, which is generally viewed as his strength despite being a .277 career hitter and only once having posted a mark above .300 (.302 in ’13).

Last season his less than stellar average came courtesy of a 16.5% line drive rate (the second time in the past three seasons he was below 17%) and a career worst 19.8% strikeout rate.  His SwStr% jumped to 11.9% (9.2% for his career), explaining the regression.  The issues were against all types of pitches, as he saw his Whiff% rise across the board:

  • Hard – 8.91%
  • Breaking – 16.74%
  • Offspeed – 20.40%

Generally we’d equate that type of increase with swinging for the fences, and while the power did increase that obviously wasn’t the case.  To an extent that makes the issue even more concerning.

So we have a player whose power will likely regress, has concerning underlying metrics towards his average and doesn’t offer much speed.  At a deep position, does that sound like a player who belongs in the Top 15?

Sources – Fangraphs, Brooks Baseball

*** Order Rotoprofessor’s 2017 Fantasy Baseball Draft Guide for Just $7.00 By Clicking Here!!   Not only will you get all the help you need to dominate your fantasy draft, but you will also be entered to win a Noah Syndergaard autographed baseball, complete with “Thor” inscription! ***

Make sure to check out our other Early 2017 Rankings:

Standard League
OBP League
First Base01/16/1703/07/17
Second Base03/22/1703/09/17
Third Base02/06/1703/12/17
Outfield#1-20 |03/16/17

#21-40 |03/16/17
Starting Pitcher#1-20 |02/27/17

#21-40 |03/02/17
Relief Pitcher01/02/17--


  1. Alex says:

    It’s really tough to let go of name power, especially when the guy is in his twenties. Sort of like Brandon Belt, another guy we keep waiting for. Overall, it seems that Hosmer is definitely more of a CI guy, but given his name he’ll probably be reached for higher than typical CI hitters like Adrian Gonzalez or Mike Napoli.

  2. Bbboston says:

    Hosmer had a obvious hitch in his swing that with some adjustments he could fix, but won’t….. Guy has just enough success that he fools himself into believing in the future, instead of reworking his mechanics. If he went to the JD Martinez/Charlie lau school of hitting, he’s be an absolute monster.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *