Is There A Negative To Adrian Gonzalez?

By Rob Cardno

About a week ago I began to pen an article about Adrian Gonzalez being too high in the rankings. I’ve seen him going as high as nine in mock drafts and usually no later than the late teens. I have yet to see a single article offering a dissenting opinion and that’s when my contrarian ears perked up. As a rule, if everyone loves something I tend to hate it. It usually occurs to me that once 100% of the public is behind a player, product or stock, there is nowhere for it to go but down. There is now no one left to be convinced so essentially value has been maxed out. So I set out on a mission to debunk his lofty ranking.

I knew all the reasons why ‘Dr. Gonzo’ (man needs a nickname-I’m trying a few out in this post) was to have a monster year. The home/road splits, the shift to a hitter’s park, the contract year, the great line up around him, etc. It seemed too good to be true. So I dove into his stats looking for a chink in the armor. The results were surprising… His numbers are stunning.

There’s remarkable consistency across the board. I could barely find any discrepancies. His batted ball rates barely waiver, his strikeout rate has dropped the last two years, he has the pedigree (former no.1 overall) and he doesn’t miss any games (avg. 160 games played over the last five years).

Not satisfied with the pristine stats I’ve seen so far I dug deeper into these mythical home/road splits. Ugh…my case just got worse. Not only was ‘A-Gone’ affected by Petco but also notorious pitcher parks-Dodger Stadium and AT&T Park. He has a career SLG% of .364 in Dodger Stadium. He actually fared better against them at home. In total- 64% of his games are played in three of the kindest venues for hurlers.

I decided to readjust some of his stats taking away those ballparks. Here are his career SLG%:

All games – .507
Road games – .568
Road games minus LA and SF – .595

Sure, getting to play in Colorado and Arizona helps, but it’s impossible to take every scenario into account.  At this point I’m starting to become a believer, but I just can’t let this argument go yet. There’s a conversation I heard last year between two of the Padres announcers.

They had asked ‘Rocky’ about how difficult it was to hit in Petco. His answer was surprising. He said he stopped trying to hit HRs when at home and therefore was able to use the park to take even strokes and correct any bad habits he developed while on the road. This might be nothing, but it’s important to consider that while San Diego may not be friendly to hitters, it might be the most accommodating and friendly city in every other way.

You can crunch all the numbers you like. You can superimpose a Petco hit chart onto Fenway (like you see in this wonderful link) and surmise that Petco robbed him of 15-20 extra base hits.

However, how do you factor in playing half your games in your hometown surrounded by beautiful woman, surfing, Top Gun memorabilia and El Pollo Locos? Is there anything to this comment? Was Petco a glorified batting cage that enabled him to scorch the opposition on the road? There is reason to be skeptical, but the good far outweighs the bad.

There’s no way of predicting how the ‘Chula Vista Chupacabra’ will respond to the pressure of hitting in Boston and New York, but if you just believe the numbers than he might be even better than people are predicting.

My initial argument was why take .280-30-100 from ‘The Big Chimichanga’ in Round 1 when you may get those numbers from Adam Lind in Round 10? A deeper look at the numbers suggests that 30-100 might be the low end. Putting up 40-120 with a .600 SLG not only seems reasonable, it seems almost automatic.

While I still think top ten is a little high considering the depth of 1B, I can’t fault anyone for grabbing this potential MVP candidate. Well played ‘Senor Perilla’, you’ve convinced this skeptic.

**** Make sure to order your copy of the Rotoprofessor 2011 Fantasy Baseball Draft Guide, selling for just $5, by clicking here. ****

Make sure to check out some of our 2011 projections:

7 comments

  1. Dave Maloney says:

    Good research, but i still dont’ think “The Big Chimichaga” (im going with that one) should be 1st round material. You have to either the best at your postion, which i think he’s top 5, or you have to be the best or 2nd best at a tough position like SS. He’s a lock for 30-100, but so are 25 other guys.

  2. Rob says:

    I agree that position depths are a factor but Gonzo would get 30-100 accidentally while hitting clean up for the Sox. And his ceiling might be 100-40-120-300. Numbers like that can make up for any deficiencies you may have in the middle infield.

  3. Will Overton says:

    I think Gonzalez is a first rounder even with the depth at first base.

    This is good stuff man, looking forward to more of your posts.

  4. Donb Stetz says:

    I tend to think that “Yo Adrian” is going to high. He’s never had an ADP above 30 and now going in the top ten in most mock drafts. I’ll let someone else pay the $40 to get him and hope he returns $30 of value for my beloved Red Sox.

  5. Kevyn says:

    I agree with DM & DB. I think his ADP is way high. You do make a strong case that he IS capable of 100-40-120-300 but my gut is telling me to pass. With depth at 1B, I would be more inclined to grab player at a shallower position and or a 1B who won’t have as much pressure to perform. New Team, New Park = Great Expectations & Nerves of Steel. I’ll be a spectator and watch it unfold. If I miss out, no regrets.

    Nice Article, well researched.

  6. Chuck says:

    This article really sums up my thinking on A-Gone. I think he could put up the best HR/RBI numbers on the board, while dramatically improving his BA. I feel fine taking him at the end of the first and believe he is a full rung above Teixeira at this point.

  7. Paul says:

    The only reason that A-Gon’s ADP was around 30 is that he played for Padres. After top 3 1B (Pujols, Cabrera and Votto), A-Gon is number 4 1B who deserves to go between late first round and early second round. People tend to say that 1Bs are deep, but after top 8 (all gone within the first 3 rounds), there is a big drop.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>