Going Deep: What Should We Make of Russell Shepard?

by Ray Kuhn

So far this season, his fourth in the NFL, Russell Shepard has already eclipsed his career reception total. After going without a catch in his rookie season, Shepard had a combined seven catches in the next two seasons while spending the majority of his time on special teams.

Over the summer, especially prior to the beginning of training camp, quotes from coaches often don’t hold much value. One of the great skills of being a fantasy owner, is being able to differentiate news that has legitimate value from fluff. Shepard was one of the players Tampa Bay’s head coach, Dirk Koetter, praised as being in the wide receiver conversation for 2016. 

Now, with the season ending injury to Vincent Jackson, opportunity has presented itself to Shepard and he took advantage of it last week.

Entering Tampa Bay’s game in San Francisco, there was speculation that Cecil Shorts would be replacing Jackson opposite Mike Evans. Adam Humphries has surprised so far this season, but that success has come out of the slot. After catching two of his three targets for 17 yards last week, Humphries has 22 catches for 233 yards and a touchdown through six games.

The Buccaneers appear committed to leaving Humphries in the slot, and Shorts was ultimately not targeted last week. That brings us to Shepard who was targeted eight times against the 49ers. After spending his first three seasons just about exclusively on special teams, Shepard capitalized on his new found role by catching five passes for 77 yards and a touchdown.

It is clear that Tampa Bay is going to continue throwing the ball downfield, and Evans (while he will continue to have success as a WR1), will also receive a great deal of opposing defense’s attention. And that will open up opportunities for Shepard.

This week’s match-up against Oakland and their leaky pass defense (along with their explosive offense) will feature lots of offense between teams, and plenty of opportunities for Shepard to put together a repeat performance.

Going Deep: Does Tyreek Hill Have Real Value This Week?
Going Deep: Will Andrew Luck Connect with Chester Rogers?

6 comments

  1. dodge10 says:

    pick two-palmer, wilson or fitzpatrick.

    pick two-gore, michaels or jacquizz rodgers

    pick two-sanders, pryor, hopkins or marshall

    • pick two-palmer, wilson or fitzpatrick – Sit Fitz

      pick two-gore, michaels or jacquizz rodgers – Sit Gore

      pick two-sanders, pryor, hopkins or marshall – Marshall/Hopkins (though I really want to say Marshall/Pryor)

  2. Randy says:

    In a 12-team standard, I have Miller, Jacquizz, Crowell, Gore, Dwayne Wash, and Jordan Howard at RB. Would you drop any of these for Gillislee or Alfred Blue? We start 2 RB and I’m not in need of a starter this week per se.

    Also in a 10-team standard, I have Ware, Jaquizz, Miller, Booker, and Howard at RB. Would you drop Howard for Dwayne Washington, Rob Kelley, or Alfred Blue? Again, this move would be more ROS than for this week.

    Lastly, in the same 10-team standard league, I have ARob, Cobb, Moncrief, Pryor, and Michael Thomas. Would you drop any for Corey Coleman, Maclin, Edleman, or Coates? We have roster limits, so I cant’ drop from another position; it’d have to be someone from this group.

    Thank you!

    • #1 – I wouldn’t bother, neither of those players likely have a long-term impact

      #2 – I’d swap Howard for Kelley at this point. Higher long-term upside

      #3 – Though. there’s a lot of upside out there (mostly Maclin/Edelman), but is it higher than what you have? I’d probably swap Thomas for Maclin, but it’s not a must move

  3. dodge10 says:

    lamar miller or lativius murray

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>