Quick Hit: Deciphering The Raiders Receiving Corps & Their Week 9 Performances

Whenever a team makes a change at quarterback you have to wonder how the rapport will be with the wide receivers.  When there is no clear-cut top target (like a Larry Fitzgerald or Calvin Johnson) you really just never know whose direction the bulk of the throws will be.  With Carson Palmer making his first start as an Oakland Raider, let’s take a look at which wide receivers were targeted and which were left behind:

  • Denarius Moore – 12 targets (4 receptions for 61 yards)
  • Jacoby Ford – 6 targets (5 receptions for 105 yards and 1 TD)
  • T.J. Houshmandzadeh – 4 targets (1 receptions for 28 yards)
  • Chaz Schillens – 2 targets (2 receptions for 20 yards)
  • Louis Murphy – 1 target (1 reception for 23 yards)
  • Darrius Heyward-Bey – 1 target (0 receptions)

The Professor’s Take:
The receiving situation in Oakland has been a murky one since the beginning of the season, but Darrius Heyward-Bey had been stepping up in recent weeks.  He had posted four straight games of over 80 yards, totaling 22 receptions for 385 yards and 1 TD.  However, with Carson Palmer in place, those numbers clearly can be thrown right out the window and he apparently just wasn’t on the field much. 

Just to add a little fuel to the fire, Vittorio Tafur (via Twitter) is reporting that, “Re limited playing time for Heyward-Bey and Boss, Hue said it was only due to specific “sets” team was running”.  Cleary it’s not to say that he should be completely forgotten about by fantasy owners, but he should firmly find a spot on your bench for now.  Who knows if they are going to incorporate the necessary “sets” to get him into the lineup or if he is quickly going to lose his luster.  Given what he showed you need to stay patient, but do so while utilizing other options.

This week it was Moore, who had 2 receptions for 13 yards over the past three weeks, who played the favorite target role.  Would I count on him being the most targeted receiver going forward?  Absolutely not, especially since he and Palmer connected on just 33% of the targets.  That’s a terrible percentage and will likely cause a change of philosophy.

While the familiarity between Palmer and Housmandzadeh will likely play a role, the receiver coming out of this game that had to grab our attention is Jacoby Ford.  Not only did he have a big performance, but he made the most of the opportunities given to him.  Is he going to be able to maintain this type of performance week in and week out?  Absolutely not, but the upside is there making him worth stashing in deeper formats.

Exactly what is the moral of this tale?  Right now the entire Raiders’ receiving corps is completely in flux.  There is plenty of potential, most notably with Ford at this time, but you really just don’t know who is going to be the targeted receiver.  None of their receivers are advisable plays, even in three wide receiver formats, until we gain a little bit more clarity.

Make sure to check out all the rest of our Week 10 articles:

 

Posted on by Rotoprofessor. This entry was posted in Quick Hits. Bookmark the permalink.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

5 Responses to Quick Hit: Deciphering The Raiders Receiving Corps & Their Week 9 Performances

  1. Thomas says:

    Was Champ covering Heyward-Bey? I sat his last week fearing that and it paid off. But if he was, then that might be why he was held to no catches.

    • No, he just simply wasn’t on the field very much (the same thing could be said for Kevin Boss). We’ll have to see how things go moving forward, but it’s possible that he’s simply fallen out of favor.

  2. Ketan says:

    I’ve lost Miles Austin again and with 4 weeks remaining in the season, I am ready to drop him.

    My options are Laurent Robinson, and the Raiders you mention: Jacoby Ford, Denarius Moore.

    My options for 3 starting spots are Nicks, Maclin, Colston, Aaron Hernandez, Tony Gonzalez in 12–team PPR, with Austin.

    Would you take Robinson and Ford over Austin and Gonzalez? I’m just tired of Austin – with 4 weeks left in the season – he peaked at Week 2.

    Thanks.

  3. Mike says:

    You and I had a long talk last week about me starting DHB or Daniel Thomas and I was saying how my gut was saying go with DHB over Thomas. Well, that is what I did… DHB fantasy points = 0… Daniel Thomas fantasy points = 1.2…. Final score of my losing week 9 matchup = 126.6 to 126.5…. If only I listened to you…

    I think I am about to give up with my team. There is a 5 way tie for first at 6 Wins 3 Losses and I am 4-5… I lost week 8 by .3 points and week 9 by .1 points…. I don’t know if it’s worth all of this time and effort I’m putting into it!!!!!

  4. Mike – I can certainly understand your frustration, but don’t give up hope! Crazy things happen!

    Ketan – For this week I would start some combination of Nicks, Maclin, Colston & Hernandez, so I don’t see the need to do anything drastic. I do like Robinson for this week as a WR2, but not more than those guys. I understand your frustration with Austin, but he could be a viable option in the fantasy playoffs and is worth keeping stashed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

























































Pages